← Back to blog
Blog

State of the iGaming Affiliate Market 2026: Active Accounts and Cohort Revenue

Modeled Industry Benchmarks. Prepared 15 October 2026. Published figures retain their original period and population. Scenario inputs are explicitly illustrative and are not measured industry averages, forecasts, or results from iGamingXpert customers. This series studies affiliate measurement; it does not estimate a universal CPA, conversion rate, or player lifetime value.

Can reported active accounts be treated as unique players?

No. The Gambling Commission’s January–March 2026 operator release reports £1.55 billion in online GGY and 13.4 million average monthly active accounts in its reporting sample. The Commission warns that activity across verticals can count an account more than once. The sample does not cover every operator, and some reported activity can include bonuses. These figures do not identify unique acquired players.

What ratio can be computed without changing the denominator?

Using the published rounded numbers, £1.55 billion divided by three months and 13.4 million average monthly activity counts gives approximately £38.56 per account-activity month. The denominator is 40.2 million activity-month units. This is an analytical proxy derived from aggregates, not a verified unique-player ARPU or commissionable NGR measure.

Derived proxy from rounded January–March 2026 sample figures
Input or resultValueStatus
Quarterly online GGY£1.55bnPublished, rounded
Average monthly active accounts13.4mPublished activity measure
Quarter length3 monthsJanuary–March
Derived account-activity months40.2m3 × 13.4m
Derived GGY per activity month£38.56£1.55bn / 40.2m

How does a cohort model use a genuinely separate assumption?

For a synthetic cohort, assume £40 of commissionable monthly NGR per active qualified player, a 30% RevShare rate and 90% monthly retention. The £40 is a deliberately chosen scenario input, not an estimate obtained by relabeling the £38.56 aggregate proxy. One hundred initially qualified players generate £1,200 in month-one commission. Expected active players fall geometrically in later months.

Illustrative single-cohort commission, no new acquisition or reactivation
MonthExpected active playersMonthly commissionCumulative commission
1100.00£1,200.00£1,200.00
290.00£1,080.00£2,280.00
381.00£972.00£3,252.00
659.05£708.59£5,622.71
1231.38£376.57£8,610.85

Expected active players in month n equal 100 × 0.9 raised to n − 1. Cumulative commission through month n equals 100 × £40 × 30% × (1 − 0.9 raised to n) / (1 − 0.9). Fractional players represent expectations over repeated comparable cohorts. They are not literal fractions of a participant.

Which observation would validate the retention assumption?

A cohort retention estimate requires an initial acquisition month, a consistent qualified-player definition and a subsequent activity event. Count a returning player once per observation period under the same identity rule. Do not infer retention from a change in all-site active accounts: new acquisition and reactivation can replace lost players while hiding cohort attrition.

Track actual cohort revenue beside active-player counts. A stable average for retained players can conceal changes in product mix or a few large outcomes. Reconciliation should preserve the original acquisition period and subsequent financial month. An operator changing the activity definition creates a measurement break; it should not be interpreted automatically as a behavioral change.

What prevents this proxy from becoming an acquisition benchmark?

The aggregate proxy lacks affiliate attribution, acquisition age, contractual deductions and a deduplicated player population. Each missing dimension matters to commission economics. The appropriate next calculation is a cohort-specific revenue bridge from the operator’s ledger, with documented qualification and deduction rules. It is not a universal CPA bid inferred from a market average.

The report supplies two inspectable calculations with different purposes. The published-data ratio describes activity in a particular reporting sample. The cohort table demonstrates geometric retention under declared assumptions. A 2026 acquisition decision needs its own observed cohort data before either calculation can support a commercial commitment.

Sources and reproducibility

Gambling Commission: operator data to March 2026, published 21 May 2026. Accessed 15 October 2026. Preserve the source period, currency, definitions and revision status when rerunning these calculations.

Prepared by the iGamingXpert editorial team. This is a desk-research and scenario-modeling report; no primary operator or player dataset was collected. Calculate RevShare profitability with your own documented assumptions.

iGaming Xpert
Written by
iGaming Xpert